CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION MODEL OF MANAGEMENT INTERACTION

Автор(и)

  • Irena Svydruk Lviv University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2020-2-14

Ключові слова:

economic system, competitiveness, management virtualization, information flows, management interaction, business process

Анотація

Introduction. Achieving economic growth and high competitiveness of the enterprise in the market requires flexible development of tools to respond adequately to changes in the environment. The projected complication of the competitive business environment requires management to review existing management strategies and generate innovative ideas to identify new business priorities and formulate new models of managerial engagement. Methods. The analysis is based on systemic, structural, functional and synergistic approaches. Universal methods of formal logic and scientific abstraction, basic principles of research of innovation, investology, institutionalism, system-functional analysis of organizational construction of administrative interaction are used. Results. The direction of economic systems in the post-industrialization phase actualizes the need to move to innovative management principles to achieve competitive strategies. Established hierarchical models of management are not able to provide the necessary level of competitiveness of enterprises, which requires updating of management interaction schemes. The virtualized model takes into account the dynamism of the environment, provides high speed of transformations, initiates sufficient flexibility of technological and administrative-management infrastructures of the enterprise. The use of previously untapped benefits of information technology has led to the partial replacement of traditional management structures with more flexible ones. The need to save resources in times of systemic crisis leads to greater use of the outsourcing model, which forms a qualitatively new vision of virtualized business development. The flexibility of management interaction contributes to the leadership of the company when launching an innovative product on the market. Building a management system based on the principles of modeling complex business processes using horizontally directed information flows allows to build integrated competitive strategies of innovative production, involving managers of all levels in the management processes. Discussion. Further research should be directed to the development of methodological foundations for reformatting the systems of managerial interaction, depending on the peculiarities of the functioning of domestic business, working out methods of calculating the effectiveness of updated organizational structures of management, issues of institutional support for innovative enterprises.

Біографія автора

Irena Svydruk, Lviv University of Trade and Economics

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor

Посилання

Hontareva, I.V., & Sheianova, Yu.D. (2018). Zastosuvannia orhanizatsiinykh innovatsii yak osnovy pobudovy mekhanizmu formuvannia orhanizatsiinoho kapitalu subiektiv pidpryiemnytstva [Application of organizational innovations as a basis for building the mechanism of organizational capital formation of business entities]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu [Bulletin of Khmelnitsky National University], 3 (2), 94-97.

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi web-resurs. ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/.

Yershova, O.O. (2019). Instytutsionalne zabezpechennia mekhanizmu upravlinnia rozvytkom biznesprotsesiv pidpryiemstva [Institutional support of the mechanism for managing the development of business processes of the enterprise]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu [Uzhgorod University Scientific Bulletin], 2 (54), 85- 89.

Zhyhalkevych, Zh.M. (2018). Kvaziintehratsiini struktury vzaiemodiiuchykh pidpryiemstv: zakony ta zakonomirnosti formuvannia [Quasiintegration structures of cooperating enterprises: laws and laws of formation]. Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi [Problems of Systematic Approach in Economics], 1(63), 61-66.

Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy. (2019). Proiekt Biudzhetu 2020. Biudzhet rozvytku ta bezpeky liudei. www.kmu.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/proyekt-byudzhetu-2020-byudzhet-rozvitku-tabezpeki- lyudej.

Koval, O.P. (2014). Optymizatsiia vytrat u sferi posluh shliakhom virtualizatsii biznes-protsesiv [Optimization of service costs by virtualizing business processes]. Visnyk Chernihivskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu [Bulletin of Chernihiv State Technological University], 1 (74), 62-67.

Kotkalova-Lytvyn, I.V. (2018). Rozrobka stratehii rekoverynhu biznes-protsesiv na osnovi rozshyrennia orhanizatsiino-innovatsiinykh horyzontiv rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Development of a strategy of business process recovery based on the expansion of organizational and innovative horizons of enterprise development]. Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Economics and Intellectual Property, 18, 92-98.

Lukashov, O.O. (2018). Obgruntuvannia orhanizatsiinoi struktury kompleksnoho mekhanizmu derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia stratehichnoho rozvytku rehionu [Substantiating organizational structure of complex mechanismfor state regulation of regional strategic development]. Derzhavne rehuliuvannia protsesiv ekonomichnoho i sotsialnoho rozvytku [State Regulation of Economic and Social Development Processes], 4 (63), 2-11.

Ministerstvo rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. (2020). Ukraina u 2020-2021 rokakh: naslidky pandemii. Konsensus-prohnoz. www.me.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.me.gov.ua/Documents.

Olshanskyi, O.V. (2019). Analiz metodiv udoskonalennia biznes-protsesiv pidpryiemstv torhivli [Analysis of methods of improving business processes of trade enterprises]. Derzhava ta rehiony [State and regions], 2 (107), 104-110.

Romanova, Yu.A., & Yegorenko, A.O. (2013). Konkurentnaya razvedka: novyy vzglyad v usloviyakh globalizatsii ekonomiki [Competitive intelligence: a new look in the economy of globalization]. Upravleniye ekonomicheskimi sistemami [Economic systems management], 4(52). uecs.ru. Retrieved from http://uecs.ru/index.php?option= com_flexicontent&view=items&id= 2079.

Svydruk, I.I. (2017). Rol intelektualnoho kapitalu v postindustrialnomu suspilstvi [The role of intellectual capital in a post-industrial society]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University], 26 (1), 103-106.

Semerun, L.V., & Nosova, T.I. (2019). Metodychnyi instrumentarii formuvannia polityky upravlinnia ekonomichnym potentsialom torhovelnoho pidpryiemstva [Methodical toolkit for forming the policy of managing the economic potential of a trading enterprise]. Natsionalna ekonomika. Intelekt XXI [National economy. Intelligence XXI], 2, 62-69.

Stets, I.I. (2019). Identyfikatsiia biznes-protsesiv pidpryiemstva [Identification of business processes of the enterprise]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy [Enterprise Economics and Management], 33, 233-240.

Stupnytskyi, Ye.R. (2018). Autsorsynh bukhhalterskykh funktsii yak sposib orhanizatsii obliku na pidpryiemstvi: suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy doslidzhennia [Outsourcing of accounting functions as a way of organizing accounting at the enterprise: current state and prospects of research]. Hlobalni pryntsypy finansovoho, oblikovoho ta analitychnoho zabezpechennia ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky: Mizhn. nauk.-prakt.konf. Kharkiv, 183-186.

Tsalko, T.R., & Nevmerzhytska, S.M. (2019). Systema kliuchovykh pokaznykiv efektyvnosti yak zaporuka efektyvnoho upravlinnia biznes-protsesamy v kompanii [The system of key performance indicators as the key to effective management of business processes in the company]. Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi [Problems of Systematic Approach in Economics], 6 (74), 160-167.

Chebakova, T.O. (2018). Novatsii v otsiniuvanni uporiadkuvalnoho aspektu orhanizatsiinoi kultury pidpryiemstva [Innovations in the evaluation of the organizational aspect of the organizational culture of the enterprise]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid [Investments: Practice and Experience],10, 68-72.

Cherniavska, I.M. (2017). A model for determining the effectiveness of organizational and managerial innovation [The model assessing the organizationaland administrative innovation effectiveness]. Ekonomika rozvytku [Economics of development], 1, 83-90.

Shabranska, N.I. (2017). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm rehuliuvannia innovatsiinoi diialnosti z urakhuvanniam riznykh form hospodariuvannia [Organizational and economic mechanism of regulation of innovative activity taking into account different forms of management.]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini [Formation of market relations in Ukraine], 7-8, 41-49.

Agostinho, O.L. (2015). Proposal of organization framework model, using business processes and hierarchical patterns to provide agility and flexibility in competitiveness environments. Procedia engineering, 131, 401–409.

Calacanis, J. (2017). Angel: How to Invest in Technology Startups – Timeless Advice from an Angel Investor Who Turned $ 100 thousand into $ 100 million. New York: Harper Business.

Ferreira, L., Lopes, N., & Ávila, P.S. (2017). Virtual Enterprise integration management based on a Metaenterprise – a PMBoK approach. Procedia Computer Science, 121, 1112-1118.

International Monetary Fund. (2020). World Economic Outlook. www.imf.org. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/weo-april-2020

Lu, L., Marín-Solano, J., & Navas, J. (2019). An analysis of efficiency of time-consistent coordination mechanisms in a model of supply chain management. European journal of operational research, 279, 211-224.

Schmiedel, T., vom Brocke, J., & Recker, J. (2014). Development and validation of an instrument to measure organizational cultures’ support of Business Process Management. Information & Management, 51(1), 43- 56. 26. Vivo, G., Zanella, A., & Tokcalar, O. (2017). The ROBO-PARTNER EC Project: CRF Activities and Automotive Scenarios. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 364-371.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2020-06-30

Як цитувати

Svydruk, I. (2020). CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION MODEL OF MANAGEMENT INTERACTION. Економічний дискурс, 1(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2020-2-14

Номер

Розділ

Статті