METHODICAL TOOLS FOR ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF BUSINESS PROCESSES WITHIN THE STABILISATION COMPONENT OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISM

Автор(и)

  • Ihor Miroshnychenko
  • Oleksandr Bradul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2026-1-6

Ключові слова:

corporate governance, business processes, stabilisation, efficiency, BSC, EP2M, enterprise resilience

Анотація

Introduction. The relevance of this study is driven by the need to develop effective corporate governance mechanisms under conditions of economic instability, which require the integration of tools for assessing the ability of business processes to ensure enterprise stabilisation.

Methods. The study is based on the application of systemic and process-oriented approaches, including methods of theoretical generalisation, comparative analysis, structural modelling, expert evaluation, and quantitative scoring. The methodological framework relies on modified Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approaches and the EP2M model. The empirical base is formed using data from Ukrainian mining and processing enterprises, in particular PJSC «Poltava Mining and Processing Plant», covering the period 2022–2024 and incorporating expert assessments (50 specialists).

Results. An original model for assessing the efficiency of business processes within the stabilisation component of corporate governance is proposed, comprising the following blocks: «Crisis Directives», «Stabilisation Execution» and «Resilience Results». The integrated level of stabilisation capability of the analysed enterprise is determined at 55.1%, corresponding to a «normal capability» level. Key weaknesses are identified, including insufficient formalisation of crisis strategy (46.5%) and a low level of recovery potential (48.2%).

Discussion. The obtained results are consistent with contemporary approaches to enterprise resilience assessment and extend them through the integration of a process-based dimension. Future research should focus on integrating the proposed model with strategic analysis tools and on automating monitoring systems for enterprise stabilisation capability.

Посилання

Adams, C., & Roberts, P. (1993). You are what you measure. Manufacturing Europe. Sterling Publications, 504–507.

Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1997). Why does business need a balanced scorecard? Journal of Cost Management, May/June, 5–10. Retrieved from https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/balanced-scorecard.htm.

Kueng, P. (2000). Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 11 (1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412007038.

Maisel, L.S. (1990). Performance measurement: The balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Cost Management, 11, 47–52. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/1a6f7b8c3d2e5f4a.

McNair, C.J., Lynch, R.L., & Cross, K.F. (1990). Do financial and non-financial performance measures have to agree? Management Accounting, 28–36. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Do-financial-and-nonfinancial-performance-measures-McNair-Lynch/5a1b2c3d4e5f6a7b8c9d.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (2005). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (12), 1228–1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639.

Neely, A., Mills, J., Platts, K., Richards, H., Gregory, M., Bourne, M., & Kennerley, M. (2000). Performance measurement system design: Developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (10), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010343708.

OECD. (2023). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance 2023. Paris : OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ed750b30-en.

Kuchynska, O., & Kandya, O. (2024). Key milestone in corporate governance reform: Ukraine enacts long-awaited law on the further liberalisation of the SOE sector. CEE Legal Matters. Retrieved from https://ceelm.com/ukraine/26004-key-milestone-in-corporate-governance-reform-ukraine-enacts-long-awaited-law-on-the-further-liberalisation-of-the-soe-sector.

Lexology. (2024). Corporate governance reform: first steps of implementation. Retrieved from https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0e9665fc-d04b-4b8f-afa0-2006aae3255b.

Orlyk, M., & Dovgan, T. (2024). Ukraine improves corporate governance in SOEs. CMS LAW-NOW. Retrieved from https://cms-lawnow.com/en/ealerts/2024/05/ukraine-improves-corporate-governance-in-soes

Ukrinform. (2024). Parliament endorses corporate governance reform for state-owned enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.net/amp/rubric-economy/3830780-parliament-endorses-corporate-governance-reform-for-stateowned-enterprises.html.

The Kyiv Independent. (2024). Ukraine state-owned enterprises weekly: Issue 122. Retrieved from https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-state-owned-enterprises-weekly-issue-122/

EFQM. (n.d.). The EFQM model. European Foundation for Quality Management. Retrieved from https://efqm.org/the-efqm-model/

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2026-04-30

Як цитувати

Miroshnychenko, I., & Bradul, O. (2026). METHODICAL TOOLS FOR ASSESSING THE EFFICIENCY OF BUSINESS PROCESSES WITHIN THE STABILISATION COMPONENT OF THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISM. Економічний дискурс, (1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.36742/2410-0919-2026-1-6

Номер

Розділ

Статті